Sarah's Advisory Session

EGO » How-To Guides

Topic: Rhetoric and Composition - Social Justice and Service Learning

First my preparation: 1) I worked very hard on that ‘personal statement,’ or whatever it’s called, to try to highlight the theme of social justice in my work and writing for Rhet/Comp, because that’s the main area I’ve been interested in. I worked closely with David Fleming, the chair of my committee, and he was very helpful. 2) I re-read the papers I was giving to the committee – a good idea. 3) I polished up my papers before I gave them to the committee – another good idea. 4) I reviewed all of the sources that I cited in my two papers – this was unnecessary. However, 5) I made a list of theorists that I could refer to – this turned out to be a good idea.

Show Respect for the Committee: We all sat around a big table, and the professors took turns asking me questions. One wanted me to give a short oral introduction, which I did – I started with “I want to thank you all for agreeing to be on this committee,” which I think is a good idea for anyone. Also, if you can compliment your teachers, genuinely, as you go along, this can also be helpful. For example, I learned [this important thing] from [the class you took with him/her]. I did that spontaneously, but I think it’s good to think about before, too

My Questions: They asked me questions based on my personal statement, or whatever it’s called, and my papers – but not very much on my papers. I was asked questions like: What does social justice mean to you? Why should we teach issues of social justice in the composition classroom? Do you consider classroom writing social action? Why? They also wanted to know: how does your interest in service learning relate to social justice? If you were going to design a service learning course, what theorists would you use? Can you describe your intellectual growth in this program? David asked: this paper you wrote truly supports a method of teaching which seems to work, but is currently rejected. How do you negotiate the tension between actual practices that work with more current pedagogies? One professor was interested in my taking literature courses as a comp/rhet student, and how they helped me in my field as well. He also suggested that I think more about my terms and complicate them more – for example ‘social change’ isn’t always a good idea. He also asked if I integrated issues of social justice into my classroom – if so, what did I do and why did I do it? This whole process was a dialogue of asking questions, my answering questions, and then more discussion based on my response. We really didn’t talk so much about my sample papers, specifically.

How I fielded the questions: The main thing I did was to listen to the question carefully and not to feel like I was on trial. I was nervous, but not too nervous, which I think is the right level to be at. Also, you can do that thing where you paraphrase the question back to the questioner to buy yourself some time. Also, smile a lot and be enthusiastic if possible. But no one was trying to be mean or trip me up, or anything like that.

The Result: In the end, they suggested that I work to define my terms better, and to ‘figure out what [I] want to know.’ I received a very positive report about this meeting and my writing in general, which made me happy.

Add a New Comment

Wiki Help

  • Log in to edit pages.
  • Use the edit buttons at the bottom of the page to make changes.
  • Create a new page by typing [[[new page name]]] on any editable page.
  • For more help, visit our help pages.
  • Join the UMass EGO wiki.
feed-icon-14x14.png RSS

Subscribe to the EGO Listserve

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License